Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 432611
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T20:05:30+00:00 2026-05-12T20:05:30+00:00

In Python, if I multiply of list of objects by an integer, I get

  • 0

In Python, if I multiply of list of objects by an integer, I get a list of references to that object, e.g.:

>>> a = [[]] * 3
>>> a
[[], [], []]
>>> a[0].append(1)
>>> a
[[1], [1], [1]]

If my desired behavior is to create a list of copies of the original object (e.g. copies created by the “copy.copy()” method or something sort of standard, is there an elegant way to do this with the same multiplication operator? Or should I just stick with a list comprehension or something? E.g.

[[] for x in range(0,3)]

Any version of Python is fine.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T20:05:30+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 8:05 pm

    The multiplication operator on a sequence means repetition of the item(s) — NOT creation of copies (shallow or deep ones) of the items. Nothing stops you from going crazy, a la:

    import copy
    
    class Crazy(object):
      def __init__(self, body, weird=copy.copy):
        self.gomez = body
        self.cousinitt = weird
      def __mul__(self, n):
        return [self.cousinitt(x) for x in (self.gomez * n)]
    
    a = Crazy([[]]) * 3
    

    …except your sanity and common sense, if any. Checking on those, how DID you dream operator * could be made to mean something utterly different than it’s intended to mean, except by defining another class overloading __mul__ in weird ways…?-)

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 228k
  • Answers 228k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It isn't possible to tell if someone else has uncommitted… May 13, 2026 at 1:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer as stated, "::" is for static method calls whereas "->"… May 13, 2026 at 1:30 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer sizeof only works on complete types. const char* TEST[] is… May 13, 2026 at 1:30 am

Related Questions

I have a situation in Python(cough, homework) where I need to multiply EACH ELEMENT
I have the following problem and I'm wondering if there's a nice way to
A generic function is dispatched based on the type of all its arguments. The
Summary I recently had a conversation with the creator of a framework that one

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.