Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 84329
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T21:54:49+00:00 2026-05-10T21:54:49+00:00

In rpc.h, the GUID structure is declared as follows: typedef struct _GUID { DWORD

  • 0

In rpc.h, the GUID structure is declared as follows:

typedef struct _GUID  {      DWORD Data1;      WORD Data2;      WORD Data3;      BYTE Data[8]; } GUID; 

I understand Data1, Data2, and Data3. They define the first, second, and third sets of hex digits when writing out a GUID (XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXX).

What I never understood was why the last 2 groups were declared together in the same byte array. Wouldn’t this have made more sense (and been easier to code against)?

typedef struct _GUID  {      DWORD Data1;      WORD Data2;      WORD Data3;      WORD Data4;      BYTE Data5[6];  } GUID; 

Anyone know why it is declared this way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T21:54:50+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 9:54 pm

    It’s because a GUID is a special case of a UUID. For information on what all the fields mean, you can look at RFC 4122.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

with RPC calls, is serialization a necessisity to get the data back to the
I am using GWT-RPC to populate Ext-GWT TreeGrids with data from a server. I
I'm making RPC in my GWT project and it's running but the data I
I'm using GWT-RPC to get the client data and my requirement is to parse
I am trying to use RPC calls for fetching data from the Server-->DB and
I am using GWT RPC & Hibernate to insert and retrieve data from MySql
I am using GWT RPC & Hibernate to insert and retrieve data from MySQL
I am using xml-rpc to insert data from a desktop app to a webserver
I prefer to use RPC Serialization but then send data using servlets. We have
I have used RPC for years but am now in a situation where we

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.