Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7931181
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T20:38:40+00:00 2026-06-03T20:38:40+00:00

In ruby, is there a way to define a method that is visible by

  • 0

In ruby, is there a way to define a method that is visible by every class in the file (or in the module), but not by files that require the file ?

Related, but not quite the same: can we redefine a method (for instance a method from a class of the standard library) such that this redefinition is visible only in the current file ? All other files should view the original definition.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T20:38:41+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 8:38 pm

    No and no.

    The only visibilities in Ruby are public, protected, and private. There is no concept of file-level visibility. You could maybe “cheat” and and do something like this:

    # In some file foobar.rb
    
    class Foo
      def to_bar
        Bar.new.file_private
      end
    end
    
    class Bar
      def file_private
        raise unless caller[0].split(':')[0] == __FILE__
      end
    end
    
    # In IRB or some other file
    
    Foo.new.to_bar  #=> nil
    Bar.new.file_private  #=> RuntimeError
    

    But this is a bad idea. A file of the same name in a different directory might work. It also isn’t true visibility, but rather enforces it in the method itself.

    Really, though, you should mostly have your classes each in their own file. It makes organization better. Further, you should not depend on public/protected/private. You can always just use send to call a private method, but the above breaks that expectation. If user of your code really wants to do something with your code, there’s next to nothing from letting them do it, that’s the nature of dynamic languages. If you don’t document a method, most users will never even know it’s there anyway :P.

    As for your second question, there is no way to have two methods of the same name in the same class with different visibility, the second method will always overwrite the original. You could do something similar to what I’ve done above, and run different code depending on the condition instead of raising, but as above I don’t really think this is a good idea.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a pretty way to make a series of method calls in ruby
In Ruby is there any method that lists all the global variables available at
I want to put a method in a Ruby module such that it can
Is there a way in a Ruby script to sftp to a server and
is there any way I can reproduce this ruby function: def Password.hash(password,salt) Digest::SHA512.hexdigest(#{password}:#{salt}) end
Is there a way to make emacs pull autocompletions of ruby methods the way
In Ruby, is there a way to get the implicit object of a case
With Ruby on Rails, is there a way for me to dump my production
I am new to Ruby, is there a way to yield values from Ruby
Ruby 1.8.7: abc[0] => 65 Ruby 1.9* abc[0] => a Is there a way

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.