Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7080297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T06:46:40+00:00 2026-05-28T06:46:40+00:00

In Ruby practice is to send id instead of object in workers. Isn’t that

  • 0

In Ruby practice is to send id instead of object in workers. Isn’t that kind of CPU consuming process because we have to retrieve Object again from database.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T06:46:41+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:46 am

    Several reasons:

    1. Saves space on the queue, also transfer time (app => queue, queue => workers).

    2. Often it is easier to fetch fresh object from the database (as opposed to retrieving cached copy from the queue)

    3. Argument to Resque.enqueue must be JSON-serializable. Complex objects not always can be serialized.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a two part question Best-Practice I have an algorithm that performs some
Background Perl and Ruby have the __END__ and __DATA__ tokens that allow embedding of
I have recently begun the process of trying to learn Ruby/Rails and have been
I have recently begun the practice of using <%# Ruby on Rails comments %>
I have a Ruby on Rails page that loads another page using jquery. I
I am very new to Ruby so could you please suggest the best practice
Ruby has two different exceptions mechanisms: Throw/Catch and Raise/Rescue. Why do we have two?
Ruby setters—whether created by (c)attr_accessor or manually—seem to be the only methods that need
Ruby on Rails has magic timestamping fields that are automatically updated when a record
I thought that this question ( How to do attr_accessor_with_default in ruby? ) answered

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.