Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8159073
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T17:48:06+00:00 2026-06-06T17:48:06+00:00

In Scala, is it possible to call a member method without having to call

  • 0

In Scala, is it possible to call a member method without having to call an instance of itself?

For instance, having this class:

class Model {
    def action(value : String) = {
        // Do action
    }
}

this object implementation works:

object MyModel extends Model {
    this action "doSomething"
}

But I would like to do something like this:

object MyModel extends Model {
    action "doSomething"
}

As one does with Java property files, since it’s a neat way to define the state of an object.

I managed to define an alias for this:

def declare = this

but it’s the same issue of having to use a word in front of the call to the member method.

Is there an option to do this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T17:48:07+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 5:48 pm

    Yes, but you have to use parentheses:

    object MyModel extends Model {
        action("doSomething")
    }
    

    See this answer for example for more detail about when parentheses can or cannot be omitted.

    As a side note, you could also alias this as follows:

    object MyModel extends Model { declare =>
      declare action "doSomething"
    }
    

    This is often useful if you want to refer to a class’s this from inside of a nested class—it’s a bit less verbose than writing Outer.this.x as you would in Java.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know if something like this is possible in Scala: case class Thing(property:String)
Is it possible in Scala to make some mixin to class instance? Eg: I
Possible Duplicate: Scala equivalent of Java java.lang.Class<T> Object Hi all, I can not call
Possible Duplicate: What is the rationale behind having companion objects in Scala? Thanks for
Scala programmer should have known that this sort of writing : class Person{ var
I can the require method in Scala's Predef class with a String as second
Related: How do you assign a function to a value in Scala? Given: class
In Scala it's possible to use the annotation @BeanProperty to automatically generate getters and
Is it possible to extend multiple classes in Scala. For example if I have
Is it possible to create types like e.g. String(20) in scala? The aim would

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.