Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6198585
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T04:02:46+00:00 2026-05-24T04:02:46+00:00

In ScalaQuery, I can do this to work with the raw result rows: for

  • 0

In ScalaQuery, I can do this to work with the “raw” result rows:

for (
  x <- queryNA[(String,Int)]("select * from foo")(
    GetResult(r => (r.<<[String], r.<<[Int]))
  )
) {
  println(x)
}

But this is entirely positional (r is a PositionedResult). Is there a way to work with the results using the column names? (E.g., row.getString(“foo”).)

I could use another DB API that supports this, like Querulous, but I’m already using ScalaQuery in my code for its type-safe queries, and would like to stick to just one library if possible.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T04:02:46+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 4:02 am

    From the ScalaQuery mailing list: you can get the underlying ResultSet with r.rs.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

ScalarQuery<int> query = new ScalarQuery<int>(typeof(Role), select count(role.RoleId) from Role as role); return query.Execute(); It
Many databases have tables with many columns, but ScalaQuery uses tuples to represent table
In the following performance tests of many queries, this timed JDBC code takes 500-600ms:
I'm trying ScalaQuery, it is really amazing. I could defined the database table using
Classic issue, new framework -- thus problem. PostgreSQL + Scala + ScalaQuery. I have
I used ScalaQuery and Scala. If I have an Array[Byte] object, how do I
The FirstExample in scalaquery-examples project provides an example of batch insert with the following
I'm using .NET Connector to connect to MySQL. In my application there are few
I've been using Scala for about 6 months, but just getting into the Lift
I just started with Scala and ran into a problem: Scala has the Types

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.