Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8458931
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T13:12:41+00:00 2026-06-10T13:12:41+00:00

in short, is there a way to define a protobuf Message that contains another

  • 0

in short, is there a way to define a protobuf Message that contains another Message of arbitrary type? Something like:

message OuterMsg {
    required int32 type = 1;
    required Message nestedMsg = 2; //Any sort of message can go here
}

I suspect that there’s a way to do this because in the various protobuf-implementations, compiled messages extend from a common Message base class.

Otherwise I guess I have to create a common base Message for all sorts of messages like this:

message BaseNestedMessage {
    extensions 1 to max;
}

and then do

message OuterMessage {
    required int32 type = 1;
    required BaseNestedMessage nestedMsg = 2;
}

Is this the only way to achieve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T13:12:43+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 1:12 pm

    Not directly, basically; protocol buffers very much wants to know the structure in advance, and the type of the message is not included on the wire. The common Message base-class is an implementation detail for providing common plumbing code – the protocol buffers specification does not include inheritance.

    There are, therefore, limited options:

    • use different field-numbers per message-type
    • serialize the message separately, and include it as a bytes type, and convey the “what is this?” information separately (presumably a discriminator / enumeration)

    I should also note that some implementations may provide more support for this; protobuf-net (C# / .NET) supports (separately) both inheritance and dynamic message-types (i.e. what you have above), but that is primarily intended for use only from that one library to that one library. Because this is all in addition to the specification (remaining 100% valid in terms of the wire format), it may be unnecessarily messy to interpret such data from other implementations.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any way to do things the short and easy way like below?
In short: is there some way I can modify a class definition such that
I'll keep it short, is there any way to define a set of DataGridTemplateColum's
Premise I believe that there is a way to objectively define "Good" and "Bad"
Short: Is there a way we can push to multiple remotes simultaneously using Github
The short version: is there a way to to write an and or an
Is there a short way to do this? def value @val end def value=(value)
Is there a short way to check/get for least significant bit in a 32-bit
Short Version: Is there a/what is the suggested way to return error details to
Short of recursing and comparing dates of files/directories, is there a better way of

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.