Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 963509
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T01:40:53+00:00 2026-05-16T01:40:53+00:00

In SQL Server 2005(2008 not tested), you can’t create a temp function like #function_name

  • 0

In SQL Server 2005(2008 not tested), you can’t create a temp function like #function_name, but you can create a functoin called function_name directly in tempdb. Does the function created in this way a temp function?
What’s the difference between a table called #table_name and the same named table directly created in tempdb?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T01:40:54+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 1:40 am

    A temp table (#test) isn’t actually called #test in the tempdb database. This is because every user on the system can create a table called #test. If you create a temp object the physical object in the tempdb database (found by looking at the sys.all_objects catalog view). In my case it was created as “#test_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________000000000003”. Where if you create a physical table in the tempdb database it is called test, and only one use at a time can create the object, and if multiple users put data into a physical table called test then they will be able to access each others data. Where when you have the temp tables users can only access their own data and their own table.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 539k
  • Answers 539k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If a debugger could see the internal state of a… May 17, 2026 at 2:26 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I tried an opensource editor: http://www.fyireporting.com/products.html, and it works! (I… May 17, 2026 at 2:26 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Relevant sections in the SWI-Prolog manual: Analysing and Constructing Atoms… May 17, 2026 at 2:26 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

This is puzzling me - in SQL Server 2005/2008, I can specify the default
SQL Server 2005/2008 Express edition has the limitation of 4 GB per database. As
Consider the following SQL Server 2005/2008 query: Select [UID], [DESC] From SomeTable Order By
I have a Sql Server 2005 DB on Godaddy. I have Visual studio 2008
I have been asked to monitor SQL Server (2005 & 2008) and am wondering
My question is similar to Upgrading SQL Server 2000 to 2005 or 2008 -
I'm using the INFORMATION_SCHEMA views in Sql Server 2005 & 2008 to obtain metadata
In my .NET application I am connecting to Microsoft SQL Server 2005 or 2008
We have a legacy database which is a sql server db (2005, and 2008).
I installed SQL Server 2008 Management Studio, and uninstalled 2005 as a consequence my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.