Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6349421
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T21:36:42+00:00 2026-05-24T21:36:42+00:00

In SQL Server 2008 Activity Monitor, I see Wait Time on Wait Category Latch

  • 0

In SQL Server 2008 Activity Monitor, I see Wait Time on Wait Category “Latch” (not Buffer Latch) spike above 10,000ms/sec at times. Average Waiter Count is under 10, but this is by far the highest area of waits in a very busy system. Disk IO is almost zero and page life expectancy is over 80,000, so I know it’s not slowed down by disk hardware and assume it’s not even touching SAN cache. Does this mean SQL Server is waiting on CPU (i.e. resolving a bajillion locks) or waiting to transfer data from the local server’s cache memory for processing?

Background: System is a 48-core running SQL Server 2008 Enterprise w/ 64GB of RAM. Queries are under 100ms in response time – for now – but I’m trying to understand the bottlenecks before they get to 100x that level.

Class                         Count     Sum Time   Max Time 
ACCESS_METHODS_DATASET_PARENT 649629086 3683117221 45600 
BUFFER                         20280535   23445826  8860 
NESTING_TRANSACTION_READONLY   22309954  102483312   187 
NESTING_TRANSACTION_FULL        7447169  123234478   265 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T21:36:43+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 9:36 pm

    Some latches are IO, some are CPU, some are other resource. It really depends on which particular latch type you’re seeing this. sys.dm_os_latch_stats will show which latches are hot in your deployment.

    I wouldn’t worry about the last three items. The two nesting_transaction ones look very healthy (low average, low max). Buffer is also OK, more or less, although the the 8s max time is a bit high.

    The AM_DS_PARENT latch is related to parallel queries/parallel scans. Its average is OK, but the max of 45s is rather high. W/o going into too much detail I can tell that long wait time on this latch type indicate that your IO subsystem can encounter spikes (and the max 8s BUFFER latch waits corroborate this).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I tried to turn on the Activity Monitor using SQL Server 2008 Management Studio
SQL Server 2008: Sorry for the possibly non-informative title but I'm not sure quite
Sql Server 2008 does not natively support hit highlighting in its FTS functionality, and
SQL Server 2008: DECLARE @MyTable TABLE( PersonID INT NOT NULL, Person2ID INT NOT NULL,
SQL Server, very busy table, holds activity for around 6-10K users at any time
SQL Server 2008: I'm having a tough time translating my pseudo SQL to actual
SQL Server 2008 Hello. New templates I create in Template explorer are not showing
SQL Server 2008 has new geo data types. One thing I am wondering though
SQL Server 2008 Profiler always profiles all databases. I want to restrict profiling or
SQL Server 2008 Database Question. I have 2 tables, for arguments sake called Customers

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.