Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 282307
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:16:40+00:00 2026-05-12T05:16:40+00:00

In T-SQL what’s faster? DELETE * FROM … WHERE A IN (x,y,z) Or DELETE

  • 0

In T-SQL what’s faster?

DELETE * FROM ... WHERE A IN (x,y,z)

Or

DELETE * FROM ... WHERE A = x OR A = y OR A = z

In my case x, y and z are input parameters for the stored procedure. And I’m trying to get the performance of my DELETE and INSERT statements to the best of my abilities.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:16:40+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:16 am

    “IN” will be translated to a series of “OR”s…if you look at the execution plan for a query with “IN”, you’ll see it has expanded it out.

    Much cleaner to use “IN” in my opinion, especially in larger queries it makes it much more readable.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

SQL 2008 / 2005 I have SQL Query Syntax issue on Case Statement -
SQL: SELECT COUNT(*) FROM bb_posts post LEFT JOIN bb_topics topic ON topic.topic_id = post.topic_id
SQL - how to get the min/max values of a column in a table
SQL Server 2008 R2 Express Edition. I'm trying to use the import wizard to
SQL 2008 - Beginner to DBA I am confused between SQL Server Network Configuration
SQL queries are still my weakest point, so here I am with yet another
SQL Server Management Studio: Is there a way to execute current row (keyboard shortcut)
SQL update table1 with condition in table1? table1: id_x field table2: id id_x type_id;
SQL guru needed, this is killing my neurons. I have a db structure (simplified)
SQL 2008 Hello, I have a rather different task I have to do in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.