Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8031311
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T01:03:38+00:00 2026-06-05T01:03:38+00:00

In Template Meta Programming if a recursion is wrongly implemented with a resulting infinite

  • 0

In Template Meta Programming if a recursion is wrongly implemented with a resulting infinite loop, can the language compiler detect it? Or will the compiler just encounter an eventual stack overflow and crashe? My bet would be that compiler cannot detect this because doing so would violate the undecideability of the halting problem.

Am I right with the conclusion? Of course I could try this out with a piece of code, but I would like to hear more qualified thinking in this case.

Edit : Thanks guys, I get a general idea that my inference on the computation theory aspect of tmp was not wrong. I also understand that compiler implementations can have arbitrary recursion depth limits(Of course I reiterate that I could have tested this second part, but it was only my side-point).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T01:03:43+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 1:03 am

    Your are correct. Detecting an infinite recursion without limiting the recursion stack frames on template meta programming would mean finding an alternative solution to the halting problem.

    There are a few special cases which are, in theory, detectable. For example, if you can ensure referential transparency on the recursion and if the last function call receives the same parameters as the actual one, you are on an infinite recursive call. C++ offers no referential transparency warranty on template meta programming.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is it possible to use member function pointers with template meta-programming? Such as: class
I am documenting some code which uses meta-programming heavily, for example: template<rysq::type A, rysq::type
I wonder whether some template meta-programming facility allows one to assign unique integral identifiers
I'm feeling my way into template meta-programming, slowly and I'm not sure how to
I want to get into more template meta-programming. I know that SFINAE stands for
Here's an example from wikipedia that displays C++ template meta-programming: template <int N> struct
I am trying to use template meta-programming to determine the base class. Is there
I was reading 'C++ Template complete guide' book, part about meta programming. There is
is there a difference, from prospective of meta-programming for example, between the two declarations?
I am trying to get my head around applying template programming (and at some

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.