Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6707661
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T07:39:58+00:00 2026-05-26T07:39:58+00:00

In the 3.0.4 Linux kernel, mm/filemap.c has this line of code: retval = retval

  • 0

In the 3.0.4 Linux kernel, mm/filemap.c has this line of code:

retval = retval ?: desc.error;

I’ve tried compiling a similar minimal test case with gcc -Wall and don’t get any warnings; the behavior seems identical to:

retval = retval ? retval : desc.error;

Looking at the C99 standard, I can’t figure out what formally describes this behavior. Why is this OK?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T07:39:59+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 7:39 am

    As several others have said, this is a GCC extension, not part of any standard. You’ll get a warning for it if you use the -pedantic switch.

    The point of this extension is not really visible in this case, but imagine if instead it was

    retval = foo() ?: desc.error;
    

    With the extension, foo() is called only once. Without it, you have to introduce a temporary variable to avoid calling foo() twice.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm embedding some driver into a Linux kernel when I get this error (I'm
In Linux Kernel Development, 3rd ed, this code was given for traversing the children
In the Linux kernel source code I found this function: static int __init clk_disable_unused(void)
Compiling a kernel module on 32-Bit Linux kernel results in __udivdi3 [mymodule.ko] undefined! __umoddi3
This pertains to Linux kernel 2.6 TCP sockets. I am sending a large amount
I am interested in cross-compiling a Linux kernel for an ARM target on a
The Linux kernel uses struct pid to represent PID in kernel space.The C code
I researched the Linux kernel code (2.6.11) about the creation of a process/thread, and
Linux kernel has the option to enable the TCP receive copy offload feature (
I've noticed that the Linux kernel code uses bool, but I thought that bool

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.