Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6795705
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T18:22:44+00:00 2026-05-26T18:22:44+00:00

In the code below foo returns a type A object by value. Can I

  • 0

In the code below foo returns a type A object by value. Can I somehow convert this without handy interaction into a object of type B? (Note: class A includes all data/storage mebers, class B just introduces more methods)

class A{
   /*data*/
   A foo(...);
};

class B: public A
{
/*no-data*/
  B doMagic(...);
};

/*usage*/
B bone;
B btwo = bone.foo(...) /*w\o cast*/

Thanks in advance!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T18:22:45+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 6:22 pm

    You can’t, and that doesn’t make sense the way you wrote it; and you also got syntax errors.

    You cannot convert actual base objects to derived objects, and you can’t usually sensibly go the other way, either. The usual thing you can do is convert pointers and references.

    In your case, you would typically use a covariant return value on a virtual function:

    struct A
    {
      virtual A * foo();
    };
    
    struct B : A
    {
      virtual B * foo();  // OK, this _overrides_ A::foo()
    };
    
    int main()
    {
      B x;
      B * p = x.foo(); // no cast
    }
    

    You will need to think carefully about many, many details when pursuing this approach. It’s certainly feasible, but you have to get a lot of things right. You will probably need a couple of custom constructors to make B::foo() do anything sensible.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Code below does not run correctly and throws InvalidOperationExcepiton . public void Foo() {
The code below gives me this mysterious error, and i cannot fathom it. I
The code below gives an error: Property 'Int32 Key' is not defined for type
How do I fix the code below to store a lambda so I can
I'm writing code to do Xml serialization. With below function. public static string SerializeToXml(object
How do I apply the MarshalAsAttribute to the return type of the code below?
Building my code (below) returns error 'imread' is not a member of 'cv' .
I have an object of type Foo . Foo has an Id (int) a)
In templates as shown below, I would like the call Run(&Base::foo) succeed without the
In the code below I can get the class name via: s.__class__.__name__ #Seq but

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.