Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
In the context in DDBMS, what is the difference between Vertical Fragmentation and Horizontal Fragmentation?
Is it such that the relation’s extension is fragmented for vertical fragmentation and intension fragmentation is horizontal fragmentation?
Suppose you have a relation, Student.
You divide relation Student in two sets (call them set1 and set2) such that half of the attributes of Student are in set1 and half of them are in set2. This is called ‘vertical fragmentation’, as a relation is fragmented along columns (similar to tearing a page vertically). Original relation is obtained by take the natural join of all the sets. For the natural join we require at least one attribute which is common to all the sets(generally it is the primary key).
But if our relation divided so that a subset of rows (see here all attributes are present in rows) is present with site1 (for example), another subset is present with site2, and so on, this is called ‘horizontal fragmentation’, and original relation is obtained by taking the union of all the sets. It’s like tearing a page horizontally.
As is clear, this is in the context of Distributed DBMS.