Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7516397
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T01:07:06+00:00 2026-05-30T01:07:06+00:00

In the Effective Java, the author mentioned that while (!done) i++; can be optimized

  • 0

In the “Effective Java”, the author mentioned that

while (!done) i++;

can be optimized by HotSpot into

if (!done) {
    while (true) i++;
}

I am very confused about it. The variable done is usually not a const, why can compiler optimize that way?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T01:07:07+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 1:07 am

    The author assumes there that the variable done is a local variable, which does not have any requirements in the Java Memory Model to expose its value to other threads without synchronization primitives. Or said another way: the value of done won’t be changed or viewed by any code other than what’s shown here.

    In that case, since the loop doesn’t change the value of done, its value can be effectively ignored, and the compiler can hoist the evaluation of that variable outside the loop, preventing it from being evaluated in the “hot” part of the loop. This makes the loop run faster because it has to do less work.

    This works in more complicated expressions too, such as the length of an array:

    int[] array = new int[10000];
    for (int i = 0; i < array.length; ++i) {
        array[i] = Random.nextInt();
    }
    

    In this case, the naive implementation would evaluate the length of the array 10,000 times, but since the variable array is never assigned and the length of the array will never change, the evaluation can change to:

    int[] array = new int[10000];
    for (int i = 0, $l = array.length; i < $l; ++i) {
        array[i] = Random.nextInt();
    }
    

    Other optimizations also apply here unrelated to hoisting.

    Hope that helps.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In Effective Java, the author states that: If a class implements Cloneable, Object's clone
I am reading Effective Java. In a section that talks about using function objects
I am currently re-reading Effective Java while working at a shop that makes heavy
Joshua Bloch's Effective Java describes a Builder Pattern that can be used to build
The Effective Java says that readResolve works only if all fields are transient .
Joshua Bloch's Effective Java, Item 51 is not about depending on the thread scheduler
In the guidelines to write a good hashCode() written in Effective java, the author
Effective Java , along with other sources suggest that we should consider using composition
It was suggested that Effective Java is a great book to read before programming
Whenever a question pops up on SO about Java synchronization, some people are very

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.