Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7867159
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 3, 20262026-06-03T00:38:11+00:00 2026-06-03T00:38:11+00:00

In the following code: int foo(); int bar(); int i; i = foo() +

  • 0

In the following code:

int foo();
int bar();
int i;

i = foo() + bar();

Is it guaranteed by the C standard that foo is called before bar is called?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-03T00:38:12+00:00Added an answer on June 3, 2026 at 12:38 am

    No, there’s no sequence point with +. There’s actually a quote on the Wikipedia page about it that answers your question:

    Consider two functions f() and g(). In C and C++, the + operator is not associated with a sequence point, and therefore in the expression f()+g() it is possible that either f() or g() will be executed first.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sequence_points

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following code: public struct Foo { public Foo(int bar, int baz) :
Is the following code valid? class Foo() { int* Bar; public: Foo() { *Bar
I found the following code in a library: class Bar { public: bool foo(int
Note the following code: Control foo = null; Control bar = null; int i
if I compile (under G++) and run the following code it prints Foo::Foo(int). However
I have the following code: #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp> struct Foo { int a; }; static
I have the following test-code: CREATE TABLE #Foo (Foo int) INSERT INTO #Foo SELECT
I have the following code: foo :: Int -> [String] -> [(FilePath, Integer)] ->
what is considered best practice in the following snippet: int foo(struct data *bar, struct
Consider the following code: writer.c mkfifo(/tmp/myfifo, 0660); int fd = open(/tmp/myfifo, O_WRONLY); char *foo,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.