Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5966083
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T19:44:33+00:00 2026-05-22T19:44:33+00:00

In the following code: ThreadStart ts = new ThreadStart((MethodInvoker)delegate { executingThreads.Add(Thread.CurrentThread); // work done

  • 0

In the following code:

ThreadStart ts = new ThreadStart((MethodInvoker)delegate
        {
            executingThreads.Add(Thread.CurrentThread);
            // work done here.
            executingThreads.Remove(Thread.CurrentThread);
        });
        Thread t = new Thread(ts);
        t.Start();

Perhaps you can see that I’d like to keep track of the threads that I start, so I can abort them when necessary.

But I worry that the Thread.CurrentThread is evaluated from the thread that creates the Thread t, and thus aborting it would not abort the spawned thread.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T19:44:33+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 7:44 pm

    Aborting threads is never a good idea. If you are 100% positive that whatever task you are performing in the thread you want to abort will not corrupt any state information anywhere else then you can probably get away with it, but its best to avoid doing so even in those cases. There are better solutions like flagging the thread to stop, giving it a chance to clean up whatever mess it may leave behind.

    Anyhow, answering your question, Thread.CurrentThread is executing in the method invoked when the new thread starts executing, therefore it will return the new thread, not the thread where the new thread was created (if that makes sense).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The following code should find the appropriate project tag and remove it from the
The execution of the following code yields error :No overloads of ProcessPerson Matches ThreadStart.
Work on this small test application to learn threading/locking. I have the following code,
Following code works def lab Proc.new { return foo1 }.call return foo2 end puts
Im experimenting with the following code private void timer1_Tick(object sender, EventArgs e) { Thread
Following code, when compiled and run with g++, prints '1' twice, whereas I expect
The following code works great in IE, but not in FF or Safari. I
The following code doesn't compile with gcc, but does with Visual Studio: template <typename
The following code illustrates an object literal being assigned, but with no semicolon afterwards:
The following code is in the /Courses/Detail action: [AcceptVerbs(GET)] public ActionResult Detail(int id) {

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.