Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6067059
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T09:34:03+00:00 2026-05-23T09:34:03+00:00

In the following common sample, //// @interface MyObject : NSObject { @public NSString *

  • 0

In the following common sample,

////
@interface MyObject : NSObject
{
 @public
  NSString * myString_;
}

@property (assign) NSString * myString;
@end

@implementation MyObject
@synthesize myString = myString_;
@end
////

why declare myString_ in the interface at all?

I ask because we can still get and set myString in the implementation using self.myString, [self myString], self.myString = ... and [self setMyString:...] and in fact we must if instead it’s being retained.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T09:34:03+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 9:34 am

    With the modern Obj-C runtime, declaring the ivar is more of a formality than anything else. However, there are some memory management things to keep in mind.

    First, the property declaration for an object type is usually retain, or for strings it may be copy. In either case, the new object is retained.

    Given the following code:

    NSString *string = [[NSString alloc] init];
    myString_ = string;
    self.myString = string;    // If the property was retain or copy
    

    The second assignment would leak; the first would not. This is because the property would retain something that already has a retain count of 1—it is now at 2. When you release the property in dealloc, the count goes to 1, not 0, so it won’t be released. With the first option, however, the retain count stays at 1, so dealloc brings it down to 0.

    In your example, leaving the property as assign will make the ivar declaration a formality.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following code sample: interface IData { int Count(); } interface IOperations {
I have the following interface: public interface Iface { void Sample1(); void Sample1(bool value);
Let's imagine we got the following: A) Factory interface such as public interface IEmployeeFactory
Suppose I have the following (rather common) model Client invokes web service request ->
I was wondering if the following is common for regular Java applications when receiving
In reading High performance MySQL from O'Reilly I've stumbled upon the following Another common
It seems that the following is a common method given in many tutorials on
Is there something like the following in Apache Common Lang or Spring Utils or
I have the following in a java file (MyRtmpClient.java): import org.apache.mina.common.ByteBuffer; and ByteBuffer is
i am looking for opinions if the following problem maybe has a better/different/common solution:

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.