Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 398379
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T16:44:33+00:00 2026-05-12T16:44:33+00:00

In the following constructor, is the ‘this’ keyword required? I know I can remove

  • 0

In the following constructor, is the ‘this’ keyword required? I know I can remove it, it complies and everything is okay. If I omit ‘this’ will that cause problems for me down the road? Is ommission of ‘this’ considered bad practice?

    // Constructor:
    public Employee(string name, string alias)
    {
        // Use this to qualify the fields, name and alias:
        this.name = name;
        this.alias = alias;
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T16:44:34+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 4:44 pm

    No, this is purely optional in almost all cases. The only reason it is required in your example is to disambiguate between local variables and parameters and member variables that happened to have the same identifier name.

    You could avoid the use of this by renaming either the parameter or the field to something unique.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 278k
  • Answers 278k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/lucene.net/ And 2.4 is here https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_4_0/ May 13, 2026 at 3:09 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer EDIT: depends on the compiler: see my EDIT below. EDIT… May 13, 2026 at 3:09 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From § 3.6.3 of the C++03 standard: Destructors (12.4) for… May 13, 2026 at 3:09 pm

Related Questions

In the following constructor, is the 'this' keyword required? I know I can remove
OK I am not a very experienced C++ programmer, but I was wondering what
I have a class which has the following constructor public DelayCompositeDesigner(DelayComposite CompositeObject) { InitializeComponent();
I've got a particularly tricky problem using AJAX, which works fine in IE7 and
I write JavaScript code and I try to use its functional language nature. In

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.