Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 587773
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T15:14:53+00:00 2026-05-13T15:14:53+00:00

In the following Jackson/Java code that serializes objects into JSON, I am getting this:

  • 0

In the following Jackson/Java code that serializes objects into JSON, I am getting this:

{"animal":{"x":"x"}}

However, what I actually want to get is this:

{"dog":{"x":"x"}}

Is there something I can do to AnimalContainer so that I get the runtime type (“dog”, “cat”) of the object, instead of “animal”)? (Edit: I am aware that the map name comes from the getter- and setter- method names.) The only way I can think of to do it is within AnimalContainer to have an attribute of each type of Animal, have setters and getters for all of them, and enforce that only one is valued at a time. But this defeats the purpose of having the Animal superclass and just seems wrong. And in my real code I actually have a dozen subclasses, not just “dog” and “cat”. Is there a better way to do this (perhaps using annotations somehow)? I need a solution for deserializing, as well.

public class Test
{
   public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
   {
      AnimalContainer animalContainer = new AnimalContainer();
      animalContainer.setAnimal(new Dog());

      StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();   // serialize
      ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper(); 
      MappingJsonFactory jsonFactory = new MappingJsonFactory();
      JsonGenerator jsonGenerator = jsonFactory.createJsonGenerator(sw);
      mapper.writeValue(jsonGenerator, animalContainer);
      sw.close();
      System.out.println(sw.getBuffer().toString());
   }
   public static class AnimalContainer
   {
      private Animal animal;
      public Animal getAnimal() {return animal;}
      public void setAnimal(Animal animal) {this.animal = animal;}
   }
   public abstract static class Animal 
   {
      String x = "x";
      public String getX() {return x;}
   }
   public static class Dog extends Animal {}
   public static class Cat extends Animal {} 
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T15:14:54+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 3:14 pm

    As per this announement, Jackson 1.5 implements full polymorphic type handling, and trunk now has that code integrated.

    There are two simple ways to make this work:

    • Add @JsonTypeInfo annotation in supertype (Animal here), OR
    • Configure object mapper by calling ObjectMapper.enableDefaultTyping() (but if so, Animal needs to be abstract type)
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 416k
  • Answers 416k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Use childNodes instead. children started out as a proprietary property… May 15, 2026 at 9:25 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think it comes down to how the comparison "feels"… May 15, 2026 at 9:25 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I found a solution to my problem by setting ReuseAddr… May 15, 2026 at 9:25 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.