Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1032875
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:08:51+00:00 2026-05-16T14:08:51+00:00

In the fragment below, the CodeBase property fails on the assembly System.Xml.Xsl.CompiledQuery, no where

  • 0

In the fragment below, the CodeBase property fails on the assembly System.Xml.Xsl.CompiledQuery, no where else. The message says that “The invoked member is not supported in a dynamic assembly”.

I get that the CodeBase property is not implemented, what I don’t get is why all of a sudden this is a problem. This code has been in service for months without a problem and suddenly …


 if( CompareCaseInsensitive( Path.GetFileNameWithoutExtension( assembly.CodeBase ), namespaceURI ) )
    return assembly;

I have several options available to code around this, but I’m hoping that someone can explain what happened in a way that might lead to a more robust solution.

Edited with a follow on question.

Is there some way to tell which assemblies have this property implemented and which do not without resorting to exceptions?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:08:52+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:08 pm

    Any code that’s generated with System.Reflection.Emit namespace classes won’t have a CodeBase. Since the code wasn’t loaded from an assembly, it was generated at runtime. That certainly includes System.Xml.Xsl classes, they do use the internal System.Xml.Xsl.XmlILGenerator class which heavily leans on System.Xml.Xsl.IlGen. Lots of Reflection.Emit code there.

    I cannot guess why this worked before. Maybe .NET 4.0, not sure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Given the following xml fragment: <Problems> <Problem> <File>file1</File> <Description>desc1</Description> </Problem> <Problem> <File>file1</File> <Description>desc2</Description> </Problem>
I am trying to write a fragment program that will take a texture and
I'm invoking one of SharePoint's web service APIs that returns a CAML fragment. I've
Last night I decided to add HTML fragment links in my computer listing page.
In the How Can I Expose Only a Fragment of IList<> question one of
Is there any way of using Memcached for fragment caching in Rails?
I am curious to know where the Don't Fragment [DF] Bit of the IP
What is the most evil or dangerous code fragment you have ever seen in
In firefox, I have the following fragment in my .css file tree (negative){ font-size:
In a code review, I stumbled over this (simplified) code fragment to unregister an

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.