Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6671545
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 26, 20262026-05-26T03:24:04+00:00 2026-05-26T03:24:04+00:00

In the past, I always use Class SqlBulkCopy to complete bulk insert. But I

  • 0

In the past, I always use Class SqlBulkCopy to complete bulk insert. But I don’t know how to implement it using Linq to SQL. If inserted one by one, Efficiency will be very low.
Any good ideas?
Thanks in advance and sorry for my poor English.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-26T03:24:04+00:00Added an answer on May 26, 2026 at 3:24 am

    Simple: you don’t. You just use SqlBulkCopy. LINQ-to-SQL is simply a tool. SqlBulkCopy is a tool. Use the right tool for each job. Sometimes that means using something that isn’t LINQ-to-SQL. This might mean creating a DataTable (or a spoof IDataReader if you are feeling ambitious) to represent the data; look perhaps at Convert generic List/Enumerable to DataTable? to get from your typed objects to a DataTable you can feed to SqlBulkCopy.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In past I use dynamic sql and datatable to get data from database. Such
In the past I always advocated the use of jQuery instead of Flash whenever
So in the past I've always used the pre-compiled Windows PHP binaries but then
Foreword: Okay I've used APIs in the past such as TwitterAPI but I always
In the past I've always gone and called my namespace for a particular project
In the past I've always used a FileStream object to write or rewrite an
This past summer I was developing a basic ASP.NET/SQL Server CRUD app, and unit
In past, I am using Listview and using below code can show a particular
In the past I've never been a fan of using triggers on database tables.
I am building a client side application that will use a SQL Server back

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.