Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6985953
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T18:44:49+00:00 2026-05-27T18:44:49+00:00

In the program I have pasted below, I was just wondering why the pointer

  • 0

In the program I have pasted below, I was just wondering why the pointer “p” was initialized within the for loop? I am used to reading the conditions of a for loop as: starting from this value of a variable; until it reaches this value; increment it by this much. So it seems strange to have another variable that does not determine the ending condition and is not being incremented during each iteration in there at all.

I would have just put p=&a[0]; above the for loop and left the rest. Is this just a stylistic thing or are there differences in the way things are processed depending on where you initialize p? Is one way preferred over the other?

#include <stdio.h>
#define PRD(a) printf("%d", (a) )

int a[]={0, 1, 2, 3, 4};

int main()
{
     int i;
     int* p;

     for (p=&a[0], i=0; i<=4; i++) PRD(p[i]);

     return 0;
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T18:44:49+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:44 pm

    This appears to be just a style thing. I would probably have also put the initialisation of p outside the for statement, since cramming everything in there makes the code harder to read. (Because the pattern of that for loop is different from what you might usually expect, an experienced programmer will have to stop, back up, and think about what’s in there before it will make sense. I initially thought there were four clauses in the for control statements until I noticed that the first separator was a comma.)

    Writing the code like this (instead of initialising p outside the loop) will have no effect on performance.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Just a simple program to get used to pointers. The program is supposed to
So I am having an issue within the two methods posted below. Aside from
I have the below mail program. The problem is mail program runs successfully but
I have program that has a variable that should never change. However, somehow, it
I have program, that must interact with a console program before my program can
I have program that runs fast enough. I want to see the number of
Most program languages have some kind of exception handling; some languages have return codes,
in a C program I have an long* that I want to serialize (thus
In my program I have one array with 25 double values 0.04 When I
In an embedded program I have a screen object that needs to manage a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.