Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7950371
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 4, 20262026-06-04T02:15:00+00:00 2026-06-04T02:15:00+00:00

In the pseudocode below I have a poll() function that gets called forever in

  • 0

In the pseudocode below I have a poll() function that gets called forever in the main thread. When I do this without the sleep() statement in poll(), only 2-3 items a minute get added to the queue by the other thread. Does this mean that polling blocks the put() statement?

How can I solve this problem?

public class Test extends Thread{
    private LinkedBlockingQueue<Object> queue = null;

    Test(){
        queue = new LinkedBlockingQueue<Object>(10);
    }

    public void run(){
        // Do stuff, get incoming object from network
        queue.put(o);
    }

    public Object poll(){
        Object o = queue.poll();
        sleep(1000);
        return o;
    }
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-04T02:15:01+00:00Added an answer on June 4, 2026 at 2:15 am

    Does this mean that polling blocks the put() statement?

    No, LinkedBlockingQueue is fully reentrant and the poll() method does not block the put(). However, the poll() method returns immediately. You probably should be using queue.take() which waits for there to be an item in the queue instead of returning null if the queue is empty.

    // wait for there to be an object in the queue
    Object o = queue.take();
    // no sleep necessary
    return o;
    

    Since you are constructing a constrained blocking queue of 10 entries, I guess that main is blocking on the sleep() and the queue then fills up and slows down your program. You maybe should only sleep if there poll() returns null and sleep for a shorter amount of time.

    Edit: As @JohnVint mentioned in the comments, another alternative is to use the poll(long, TimeUnit) method which will wait for an item to be added to the queue for the time period and returns null if the timer expires. That is a cleaner way to wait for something in the queue.

    // wait for 1000ms for there to be an object in the queue
    Object o = queue.poll(1000, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
    // no sleep necessary
    return o;
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a SQL Server 2008 stored procedure (pseudocode below) that goes as follows:
Hi I have below pseudo code with throws an exception like this throw new
Is there any reason why this shouldn't work? [PseudoCode] main() { for (int i
I have a for loop as below which populates this data into an array.
This is the Pseudocode I have written for a JAVA application to calculate distance
Bit of a strange one this. Please forgive the semi-pseudo code below. I have
I have an OO design question. I've written the (pseudo)-pseudocode below to help illustrate
I have a program below that doesn't seem to be doing what I want
This is probably unbelievably basic. In the code below, I have annotated the part
I have pasted pseudocode for a paxos algorithm below and was wondering if someone

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.