Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6224537
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T08:41:24+00:00 2026-05-24T08:41:24+00:00

In the pursuit of efficient batch operating on AppEngine, I’ve been experimenting with async

  • 0

In the pursuit of efficient batch operating on AppEngine, I’ve been experimenting with async calls and have ended up with a request signature that looks like… /task/batch_remove_model 200 402ms 43582cpu_ms 42859api_cpu_ms.

I understand that under the current billing model I’d pay for the 43582ms of cpu time, but how would that same resource be billed under the upcoming ‘instance based’ billing model? At that point am I simply paying per datastore operation?

Thanks for your responses.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T08:41:25+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 8:41 am

    You will pay for the 402ms of instance time used to server the request, plus you’ll pay for each of the datastore operations. Datastore operations include entity reads and entity and index writes (not RPC calls), so the cost will be proportional (probably higher) to what you’re paying now.

    For more details see the pricing FAQ.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think most people agree that complying with W3C standards is a worthwhile pursuit.
In pursuit of finding the best way to have a date displayed on a
I have been looking into game development recently and my first programming language is
In the pursuit of elegant coding, I'd like to avoid having to catch an
We have a considerable code base with relatively high test coverage for pages/forms, all
I've been doing some reading on file formats and I'm very interested in them.
Clarification: I'm referring to companies that pay developers, professionally. I understand why a hobby
I have a very special scenario, and I'm trying to add functionality to list...
I'm looking for a Matlab function which would decompose a signal using Matching Pursuit
Back in VB6, I wrote a few functions that would let me code without

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.