Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5847405
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T12:42:50+00:00 2026-05-22T12:42:50+00:00

In this simplified version of my actual problem, I have two tables: User and

  • 0

In this simplified version of my actual problem, I have two tables: User and Metadata.
Each user can have a varied number of metadata entries associated with them via a FKEY.

This Linq compiles fine:

var user = from u in Context.Users
           join m in Context.Metadata
           on u.id equals m.userid
           select new { u.id, m.value }

However, if I replace the ‘on’ clause line to be:

on new { u.id } equals new { m.userid }

it fails to compile with this error:

error CS1941: The type of one of the expressions in the join clause is incorrect.  Type inference failed in the call to 'Join'.

Does anyone know why?

And for bonus points:

I’m ultimately trying to accomplish a query like this:

var user = from u in Context.Users
           join m in Context.Metadata
           on new { u.id, "mystring" } equals new { m.userid, m.key }
           select new { u.id, m.value }

Note the use of the literal "mystring".
Needless to say, that doesn’t work either.

Thanks!

EDIT: SLaks’s answer worked, but just to be fully clear about what he’s talking about, the final on clause that works looks like:

on new { id = u.id, key = "foo" } equals new { id = mu.userid, key = m.key }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T12:42:51+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 12:42 pm

    The property names in your anonymous types must match.

    You can specify the names like this: new { UserId = u.id, Key = "mystring" }

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This is a simplified version of my database, with the actual problem applied to
I have a multi-table query, similar to this (simplified version) SELECT columns, count(table2.rev_id) As
This is a simplified version of the problem I am trying to solve: There
This is a simplified version of what I want to do. Basically I have
I have a generic method like this (simplified version): public static TResult PartialInference<T, TResult>(Func<T,
I have combined function like this(simplified version): $('label').bind('click hover', function() { $('label').removeClass(active); $(this).addClass(active); });
This is a simplified version of my question earlier today since I didn't get
So this is the simplified version of the data file: Wichita, KS[3769,9734]279835 308 1002
So this is the simplified version of the data file: Wichita, KS[3769,9734]279835 308 1002
I am not able to link RtlIpv4StringToAddressExW(). This is a simplified version of my

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.