Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8658017
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T15:39:53+00:00 2026-06-12T15:39:53+00:00

In trying to avoid deadlocks and synchronize requests from multiple services, I’m using ROWLOCK,

  • 0

In trying to avoid deadlocks and synchronize requests from multiple services, I’m using ROWLOCK, READPAST. My question is where should I put it in a query that includes a CTE, a subquery and an update statement on the CTE? Is there one key spot or should all three places have it (below)? Or maybe there’s a better way to write such a query so that I can select ONLY the rows that will be updated.

alter proc dbo.Notification_DequeueJob
    @jobs int = null
as

    set nocount on;
    set xact_abort on;

    declare @now datetime
    set @now = getdate();

    if(@jobs is null or @jobs <= 0) set @jobs = 1

    ;with q as (
        select 
            *, 
            dense_rank() over (order by MinDate, Destination) as dr
        from 
        (
            select *, 
                min(CreatedDt) over (partition by Destination) as MinDate
            from dbo.NotificationJob with (rowlock, readpast)
        ) nj

    where (nj.QueuedDt is null or (DATEDIFF(MINUTE, nj.QueuedDt, @now) > 5 and nj.CompletedDt is null))
    and (nj.RetryDt is null or nj.RetryDt < @now)
    and not exists(
        select * from dbo.NotificationJob
        where Destination = nj.Destination
        and nj.QueuedDt is not null and DATEDIFF(MINUTE, nj.QueuedDt, @now) < 6 and nj.CompletedDt is null)
    )
    update t
        set t.QueuedDt = @now, 
            t.RetryDt = null
    output 
        inserted.NotificationJobId, 
        inserted.Categories, 
        inserted.Source, 
        inserted.Destination, 
        inserted.Subject, 
        inserted.Message
    from q as t
    where t.dr <= @jobs
go  
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T15:39:54+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 3:39 pm

    I don’t have an answer off-hand, but there are ways you can learn more.

    The code you wrote seems reasonable. Examining the actual query plan for the proc might help verify that SQL Server can generate a reasonable query plan, too.

    If you don’t have an index on NotificationJob.Destination that includes QueuedDt and CompletedDt, the not exists sub-query might acquire shared locks on the entire table. That would be scary for concurrency.

    You can observe how the proc behaves when it acquires locks. One way is to turn on trace flag 1200 temporarily, call your proc, and then turn off the flag. This will generate a lot of information about what locks the proc is acquiring. The amount of info will severely affect performance, so don’t use this flag in a production system.

    dbcc traceon (1200, -1) -- print detailed information for every lock request.  DO NOT DO THIS ON A PRODUCTION SYSTEM!
    exec dbo.Notification_DequeueJob
    dbcc traceoff (1200, -1) -- turn off the trace flag ASAP
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Also trying to avoid any use of plugins, (apart from jQuery of course, whether
I'm trying to avoid using Interface Builder as much as possible. At the moment
I am trying to avoid using Net::SSH::Perl library since there is some problems in
I'm trying to avoid using a long else if statement. Lets say I have
I'm trying to avoid dot notation at all costs, but I am learning from
I'm trying to avoid using queries in while loops. Therefore I've come to the
I am trying to avoid using intents and activities within tabhost and tabwidget This
I am trying to avoid using a scalar valued functions in my project, so
Overview: I am trying to avoid a race condition with accessing an IndexedDB from
I'm trying to avoid having the same code in multiple places. Which event handler

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.