Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6333339
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T18:26:30+00:00 2026-05-24T18:26:30+00:00

In Unix systems, it is possible to dynamically monitor the system by reading data

  • 0

In Unix systems, it is possible to dynamically monitor the system by reading data from /proc. I am hoping to implement this kind of monitoring in my application, by dynamically saving “current status” into a file. However, I do not want IO delay my program, so it would be best to make the file virtual, i.e. not stored into disk but actually in memory. Is there a way of doint that? Thanks for the hint!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T18:26:31+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 6:26 pm

    Why not used shared memory and semaphores. Do a ‘man shmget’ as a starting point.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am new to Unix system. I am not sure is this task possible
After reading the mkdir(2) man page for the Unix system call with that name,
Possible Duplicate: Unix fork() system call what runs when? I looked on Wikipedia, and
I guess this question is directed at Linux/Unix system programming experts (unfortunately I am
When using mmap() for shared memory (from Linux, or other UNIX-like systems) is it
Suppose you have some source code that comes from the unix world. This source
I have code that I want to compile on all unix systems, but if
Are there any alternatives to stat (which is found on most Unix systems) which
Network file systems are offered by Windows and (L)Unix. Is there one for IBM
My Python utility script contains UNIX system calls such as status, output = commands.getstatusoutput(ls

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.