Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 70713
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T19:46:27+00:00 2026-05-10T19:46:27+00:00

In Visual Studio 2008 (and others) when creating a .NET or silverlight application if

  • 0

In Visual Studio 2008 (and others) when creating a .NET or silverlight application if you look at your project properties, it seems like you can only have one assembly name – across all configurations. I would like to compile my application as:

MyAppDebug – in debug mode and just MyApp – in release mode

Does anyone know if this is possible?

Edit:

It seems some people are questioning the reasoning behind the question, so I’ll explain a little further:

I’m working on a Silverlight application which gets automatically uploaded to our test site when I to a ‘build solution’. The trouble is, the test team are now testing the online version, whilst I work on a new one. So, I want to have a url like .\MyApp.html for the regular version that the QA team will test and then .\MyApp.html?version=debug for the current version that I’m working on.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T19:46:27+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 7:46 pm

    I’ve managed to achieve what I was after by using a post-build script:

    if '$(ConfigurationName)'=='Debug' goto debug '$(SolutionDir)ftp.bat' '$(TargetDir)$(TargetName).xap' :debug '$(SolutionDir)ftp.bat' '$(TargetDir)$(TargetName).xap' '$(TargetDir)$(TargetName)Debug.xap' 

    My ftp script basically accepts an optional parameter at the end which is what to upload the file as. So on my local machine the filenames are always the same, but in debug mode we upload it with ‘Debug’ at the end of the filename. Now I can choose in my webpage which version to show.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 119k
  • Answers 119k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Per Martin Konicek's comment, to fully disable the selection of… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would leave the parameters (cx,fx,r etc) untouched. Just multiply… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Nothing, you lose nothing. I've been using Action<> since .NET… May 11, 2026 at 11:43 pm

Related Questions

Microsoft have explained that they won't be supporting Edit and Continue under the x64
(Was: ASP.Net codebehind not finding controls on the web page) I'm using VS 2008.
Applications I am using: Visual Studio 2008 (C#/ASP.NET) Visual Source Safe 8.0 IIS 5.1
I have created an ActiveX control using C++. I use Visual Basic code to

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.