Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 71001
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T19:49:09+00:00 2026-05-10T19:49:09+00:00

In Visual Studio, I often use objects only for RAII purposes. For example: ScopeGuard

  • 0

In Visual Studio, I often use objects only for RAII purposes. For example:

ScopeGuard close_guard = MakeGuard( &close_file, file ); 

The whole purpose of close_guard is to make sure that the file will be close on function exit, it is not used anywhere else. However, Visual Studio gives me a warning that a ‘local variable is initialized but not referenced‘. I want to turn this warning off for this specific case.

How do you deal with this kind of situation? Visual Studio thinks that this object is useless, but this is wrong since it has a non-trivial destructor.

I wouldn’t want to use a #pragma warning directive for this since it would turn off this warning even for legitimate reasons.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T19:49:10+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 7:49 pm

    Method 1: Use the #pragma warning directive.

    #pragma warning allows selective modification of the behavior of compiler warning messages.

    #pragma warning( push ) #pragma warning( disable : 4705 ) // replace 4705 with warning number  ScopeGuard close_guard = MakeGuard( &close_file, file );  #pragma warning( pop ) 

    This code saves the current warning state, then it disables the warning for a specific warning code and then restores the last saved warning state.

    Method 2: Use a workaround like the following. Visual Studio will be happy and so will you. This workaround is used in many Microsoft samples and also in other projects.

    ScopeGuard close_guard = MakeGuard( &close_file, file ); close_guard; 

    Or you can create a #define to workaround the warning.

    #define UNUSED_VAR(VAR) VAR ... ScopeGuard close_guard = MakeGuard( &close_file, file ); UNUSED_VAR(close_guard); 

    Some users stated that the code presented will not work because ScopeGuard is a typedef. This assumption is wrong.

    http://www.ddj.com/cpp/184403758

    According to the C++ Standard, a reference initialized with a temporary value makes that temporary value live for the lifetime of the reference itself.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 81k
  • Answers 81k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer There is no such function in FF / JavaScript. The… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The ViewName is only present when you set it in… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your attribute won't be invoked when running as a unit… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm

Related Questions

I've been comparing a STL implementation of a popular XmlRpc library with an implementation
One thing that annoys me when debugging programs in Visual Studio (2005 in my
I used a handy macro with keybindings in Visual Studio to attach to Windows
When I'm debugging, I often have to deal with methods that does not use

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.