Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6140963
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 23, 20262026-05-23T18:11:06+00:00 2026-05-23T18:11:06+00:00

In what cases you do not have to synchronize to propagate data from one

  • 0

In what cases you do not have to synchronize to propagate data from one thread to another?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-23T18:11:06+00:00Added an answer on May 23, 2026 at 6:11 pm

    There are a few cases where you do not have to synchronize to propagate data from one thread to another, because the JVM is implicitly performing the synchronization for you.

    These cases include:

    • When data is initialized by a static initializer (an initializer on a static field or in a static{} block)
    • When accessing final fields
    • When an object is created before a thread is created
    • When an object is already visible to a thread that it is then joined with
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

This one is a case of not doing your homework.:-) Apart from dynamic loading
I have method List<Foo> getFoos () which gets the data from remote server and
I have a thread that updates it's state from time to time and I
I have not used many lambda expressions before and I ran into a case
I am having issues with overflow: hidden not working in my case. I have
Or the call to real_escape_string() in such cases is not needed? /Email value comes
I'm trying to run JUnit4 test cases on Eclipse 3.4.2 but it's not even
I would like to know a few practical use-cases (if they are not related/tied
I'm experiencing some behavior I did not expect. I have a synchronous procedure that
I have a set of methods that all synchronize to the class object (can't

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.