Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6636565
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 25, 20262026-05-25T23:12:07+00:00 2026-05-25T23:12:07+00:00

In what situation would anyone ever use the no-argument constructor of the Java Thread

  • 0

In what situation would anyone ever use the no-argument constructor of the Java Thread class?
The API says:

This constructor has the same effect as Thread(null, null, gname),
where gname is a newly generated name.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I think the target of the thread can not be modified after the new Thread object is instantiated. If the target equals null then the start method will do nothing right?

Why would you use this constructor?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-25T23:12:07+00:00Added an answer on May 25, 2026 at 11:12 pm

    For one thing, it allows you to create subclasses without the PITA of explicitly calling the superclass constructor, e.g.

    new Thread(){ 
       public void run() { ... }
    }.start();
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In what situation would it be more appropriate for me to use a bitset
In a rails application, in which situation would you use a partial and when
I am curious how others would handle this situation. I have a domain layer
Here is the situation, I have UIViewController class with a UITableView outlet. I would
I'm wondering if anyone has a suggestion for my situation: I have a process
I would like to know what is better to use in my situation and
I was just wondering how to use the function :not in my situation. This
Here's the situation: I would like to iterate through a table with input controls,
I'm in a situation where I would to generate a script for a database
I have the following situation I think would be best to show in sample

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.