Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8846245
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T11:56:02+00:00 2026-06-14T11:56:02+00:00

In x86 architecture there are one, two and three byte opcodes. What about ARM?

  • 0

In x86 architecture there are one, two and three byte opcodes. What about ARM? For example, when I disassemble a binary, can I always take first byte as opcode?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T11:56:03+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 11:56 am

    No. There are now a few arm instruction sets. The primary arm instruction set, all instructions are 32 bits and the decoding of the instruction is not isolated to one field within the instruction. The thumb instruction set is based on 16 bit instructions, same answer though, depending on the instruction the decoding is in different places. Then there are thumb2 extensions to the thumb instruction set, same answer. The thumb2 instructions are one of the undefined instructions from thumb then add some more bits to distinguish which instruction.

    Get one of the ARM Architecture Reference Manuals from infocenter.arm.com to see all of this. There are a couple of nice diagrams which show how this all works, the msbits are used to divide the instructions into different types then depending on the type the rest of the bits are decoded.

    x86 comes from the 8 bit world where the designs tended to use one memory location(/access) (at the time that was a byte) for the more commonly used instructions, then have some opcodes multiplex into a second byte. Also immediates were added in their entirety. It was okay then, but is inefficient today. x86 should be the last instruction set you learn if ever, not representative of a good instruction set, you will need to unlearn a number of things to move forward.

    wikipedia has a number of instruction sets on the wiki page itself, others it often has a direct link. IP vendors like arm and mips, as well as many chip vendors you can go right to their site and get the documentation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

We have two versions of a managed C++ assembly, one for x86 and one
I have a few questions about divide overflow errors on x86 or x86_64 architecture.
I'm familiar with X86[-64] architecture & assembly. I want to start develop for an
I would like to learn the x86 Instruction Set Architecture. I don't meaning learning
I heard on Windows x64 architecture, in order to support to run both x86
I have two MSI installers, for x86 and x64 architectures. I'd like to bundle
In x86 GNU Assembler there are different suffixes for memory related operations. E.g.: movb,
I'm trying to understand how I can paint simple graphics in x86 protected mode
Assuming a decent understanding of assembly on common CPU architectures (eg: x86), how can
Whilst learning the assembler language (in linux on a x86 architecture using the GNU

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.