Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 722293
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T05:58:23+00:00 2026-05-14T05:58:23+00:00

include/TestBullet.h:12: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conver sion before ‘(‘ token I hate

  • 0
include/TestBullet.h:12: error: expected constructor, destructor, or type conver
sion before '(' token

I hate C++ error messages… lol ^^

Basically, I’m following what was written in this post to try to create a factory class for bullets so they can be instantiated from a string, which will be parsed from an xml file, because I don’t want to have a function with a switch for all of the classes because that looks ugly.

Here is my TestBullet.h:

#pragma once

#include "Bullet.h"
#include "BulletFactory.h"

class TestBullet : public Bullet {
public:
    void init(BulletData& bulletData);
    void update();
};

REGISTER_BULLET(TestBullet);  <-- line 12

And my BulletFactory.h:

#pragma once

#include <string>
#include <map>
#include "Bullet.h"

#define REGISTER_BULLET(NAME) BulletFactory::reg<NAME>(#NAME)
#define REGISTER_BULLET_ALT(NAME, CLASS) BulletFactory::reg<CLASS>(NAME)

template<typename T> Bullet * create() { return new T; }

struct BulletFactory {
    typedef std::map<std::string, Bullet*(*)()> bulletMapType;
    static bulletMapType map;

    static Bullet * createInstance(char* s) {
        std::string str(s);
        bulletMapType::iterator it = map.find(str);
        if(it == map.end())
            return 0;
        return it->second();
    }

    template<typename T> 
    static void reg(std::string& s) { 
        map.insert(std::make_pair(s, &create<T>));
    }
};

Thanks in advance.

And unrelated to the error, but is there a way to let Bullet include BulletFactory without creating tons of errors (because of circular inclusion)? This way I would be able to remove #include "BulletFactory.h" from the top of all of the bullet subclasses.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T05:58:23+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 5:58 am

    Here’s how you get what you want. (Not using your code, exactly, skips including headers, etc. Just for the idea.):

    // bullet_registry.hpp
    class bullet;
    
    struct bullet_registry
    {
        typedef bullet* (*bullet_factory)(void); 
    
        std::map<std::string, bullet_factory> mFactories;
    };
    
    bullet_registry& get_global_registry(void);
    
    template <typename T>
    struct register_bullet
    {
        register_bullet(const std::string& pName)
        {
            get_global_registry().mFactories.insert(std::make_pair(pName, create));
        }
    
        static bullet* create(void)
        {
            return new T();
        }
    };
    
    #define REGISTER_BULLET(x) \
            namespace \
            { \
                register_bullet _bullet_register_##x(#x); \
            }
    
    // bullet_registry.cpp
    bullet_registry& get_global_registry(void)
    {
        // as long as this function is used to get
        // a global instance of the registry, it's
        // safe to use during static initialization
        static bullet_registry result;
    
        return result; // simple global variable with lazy initialization
    }
    
    // bullet.hpp
    struct my_bullet : bullet { };
    
    // bullet.cpp
    REGISTER_BULLET(my_bullet)
    

    This works by making a global variable, which will be initialized at some point during static initialization. When that happens, in its constructor it accesses the global registry and registers it with the name, and the function used to create bullets.

    Since static initialization order is unspecified, we put the global manager in a function, so when that function is called the first time the manager is created on-demand and used. This prevents us from using an uninitialized manager, which could be the case if it were a simple global object.

    Free free to ask for clarifications.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 461k
  • Answers 461k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are quite right to be concerned about the 'remove'… May 15, 2026 at 11:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer if(empty($transport[count($transport)-1])) { unset($transport[count($transport)-1]); } May 15, 2026 at 11:58 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer firstList[key] = (MulticastDelegate)Delegate.Combine(firstList[key],newFunc); with test: var data = new Dictionary<int,… May 15, 2026 at 11:58 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.