Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 109011
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:00:08+00:00 2026-05-11T02:00:08+00:00

#include<iostream> class name { public: int a; name():a(0){}; }; void add(name * pname) {

  • 0
#include<iostream> class name { public:     int a;     name():a(0){}; }; void add(name * pname) {     pname = NULL; } int main() {     name varName();     name * pName = new name();     add(pName);     add(&varName);//error C2664: 'add' : cannot convert parameter 1 from 'name __cdecl *)(void)' to 'name *' } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:00:09+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:00 am

    I think it’s worth telling you about a similar problem, that also causes trouble:

    struct foo { }; struct bar { bar(foo f); };  int main() {   // does *not* create a bar object initialized by a default constructed    // foo object.   bar b(foo()); } 

    What b really is is a function that returns a bar and takes as first argument a pointer to a function that returns a foo taking no arguments. It’s the same as:

    bar b(foo(*)()); 

    If you want to create a bar object initialized by a default constructed foo, put parentheses around the argument. That makes it doesn’t look like a function declaration anymore, and the compiler will interpret it like you want:

    bar b((foo())); 

    There are also non-obvious cases where a compiler error should be risen. GCC gets this wrong, but Comeau gets it right again. Consider the following snippet

    struct foo {   static bool const value = false; };  int main() {   int v(int(foo::value)); } 

    You will probably expect that this takes the static constant, and casts it to int, initializing the v variable to 0? No, it won’t according to the Standard, because the initializer can be interpreted as a declaration, according to pure syntax analysis, as the following shows

    struct foo {   static int value; };  // valid, parentheses are redundant! Defines `foo::value`. int (foo::value);  

    Whenever the initializer can be interpreted as a declaration, in such a situation whole the declaration will declare a function. So, the line in main declares a function like the following, omitting the redundant and meaningless parentheses

    int v(int foo::value); 

    And this will cause a compiler error when parsing the function declaration, because a function parameter name may not be qualified.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 101k
  • Answers 101k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer From the SLF4J FAQ: SLF4J is conceptually very similar to… May 11, 2026 at 8:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Answering your second question, I'll continue based on @gnud example:… May 11, 2026 at 8:10 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's really a function of the economic cost of bugs… May 11, 2026 at 8:09 pm

Related Questions

I've got a function inside of a class that returns a string. Inside this
I am still learning C++, and I have never really created my own namespaces
#include <iostream> using namespace std; class Marks { public: char* name(); }; char* Marks::name()
C++ newbie question. Please, verify I'm doing it right. I have a global application

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.