Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 996603
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T06:54:06+00:00 2026-05-16T06:54:06+00:00

#include<iostream> int& f(){ static int x = 0; x++; return x; } int main(){

  • 0
#include<iostream>
int& f(){
 static int x = 0;
 x++;
 return x;
}

int main(){

  f() += 1; //A

 f() = f() + 1; //B
 std::cout << f();
}

The above code outputs 6 on gcc and 5 on MSVC. Now when I modify A and B to f()=f() I get 5 on both compilers. What is the big deal here? Is the behavior undefined. If yes , why?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T06:54:07+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 6:54 am

    It is undefined, because in this code:

    f() = f() + 1;
    

    it is not defined which call to f() happens first.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 489k
  • Answers 489k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Not so long ago, I decided to explore away from… May 16, 2026 at 9:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could have message bundles for each Locale. Load these… May 16, 2026 at 9:04 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer An Interface totally abstracts away the implementation knowledge from the… May 16, 2026 at 9:03 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

//C++ Example #include <iostream> using namespace std; int doHello (std::string&); int main() { std::string
#include <iostream> using namespace std; /* TA <-- defines static function / \ |
I recently refactored code like this ( MyClass to MyClassR ). #include <iostream> class
For static member initialization I use a nested helper struct, which works fine for
Below code instantiates a derived singleton object based on environment variable. The compiler errors
I am trying to specialize some utility code on const member functions, but have
I'm 99% certain the answer to this is a blinding no . Please validate
I would expect that if foo is declared in class D , but not
If I change the type to const char str[Len] , I get the following
All the material I've read on Curiously Recurring Template Pattern seems to one layer

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.