Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7737883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T08:07:13+00:00 2026-06-01T08:07:13+00:00

Insertion sort requires insertion of an element in sorted order by shifting the elements

  • 0

Insertion sort requires insertion of an element in sorted order by
shifting the elements of an already sorted list while implemented
through array. If instead of using arrays, we use doubly linked-list,
what would be the time complexity?

Time Complexity Comes out to be O(n^2)? Why?
If we consider insertion for n elements then it will be
log(1) + log(2) + log(3) + ….. + log(n) – n times for n elements
hence complexity should be O(nlogn)

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T08:07:15+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 8:07 am

    Insertion into a linked list takes time O(n), not O(lg n), because you have to navigate the link structure to find the insertion point.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have implemented an insertion sort in a double link list (highest to lowest)
I have to sort an array of 10 numbers using insertion sort and display
Just got my feet wet in sorting algorithm with Haskell. I've implemented insertion-sort and
Java 6's mergesort implementation in Arrays.java uses an insertion-sort if the array length is
In insertion sort, how can we insert a new integer into an array of
How does insertion sort deal with multiple copies of an array in a distributed
This is my implementation of insertion sort in java for doubly linked list. I
I am trying to sort an array using the insertion sort algorithm. The array
While I perform insertion in the db table, the exception occurs, which says: Data
I need help regarding array insertion into mysql table. I have an array when

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.