Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9120061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T05:32:41+00:00 2026-06-17T05:32:41+00:00

Instead of doing something like this: (proxyModel is a QSortFilterProxyModel) proxyModel->setFilterRegExp(.*); Is there a

  • 0

Instead of doing something like this: (proxyModel is a QSortFilterProxyModel)

proxyModel->setFilterRegExp(".*");

Is there a right way to clear the filter? Because that looked wrong to me.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T05:32:43+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 5:32 am

    From the filterRegExp property docs:

    If no QRegExp or an empty string is set, everything in the source model will be accepted.

    So the “proper” way of clearing the filter is to pass an empty string rather than a match-all regex.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there a way instead of doing something like this: for (item in list){
Is there a way of doing something like this: $test_array = array( "first_key" =>
Right now i am doing something like this to remove the words from myList,
How can I do these 2 scenarios. Currently I am doing something like this
I am doing something like this in python class MyThread ( threading.Thread ): def
I'm consuming an XML payload that looks something like this (for a more comprehensive
I am currently sending text email in PHP and doing something like this: $from
Is there a way to set a vim filetype programmatically, so instead of doing
I'm using Java 6. Sometimes I find myself doing something like this. Map<String,List<Integer>> myMap;
I was thinking of doing something like this in PHP function doSomething() { /*

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.