Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8260185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 8, 20262026-06-08T03:02:30+00:00 2026-06-08T03:02:30+00:00

instead of this: #1 span.error { color: #fff; } #2 span.error { color: #fff;

  • 0

instead of this:

#1 span.error { color: #fff; }
#2  span.error { color: #fff; }

Is it better/quicker to use:

#1 span.error, #2 span.error { color: #fff; }

Is there a way to shorten even more?

I am accepting Ana’s answer, but for me agam360 hit the target first.
Thank you all

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-08T03:02:31+00:00Added an answer on June 8, 2026 at 3:02 am

    Yes, I believe it is better – you avoid redundancy and if you have this situation multiple times, it can significantly reduce the size of your CSS.

    Even shorter would be to add the same class to the two ids. Something like:

    <div id="#1" class="myclass">
      <span class="error">error text 1</span>
    </div>
    <div id="#2" class="myclass">
      <span class="error">error text 1</span>
    </div>
    

    and then you can write:

    .myclass span.error {
      color: #fff;
    }
    

    If you don’t have any span.error elements outside the elements having ids #1 and #2, then you could compact this further to just span.error { color: #fff; }

    If, in addition to this, the elements having class .error are always <span> elements, them it cam become .error { color: #fff; }

    So how much you can compact things really depends on your HTML structure.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Is there any get() function for this instead? {% for key, value in choices.items
Can I copy only the error message from Eclipse Problems with instead of this
Is it acceptable to use single quotes around html attribute values like this: <span
UPDATE : I do appreciate don't want that, want this instead suggestions. They are
Let's say I have a model class called Project, but instead of this: class
Do you think that C# will support something like ??= operator? Instead of this:
Is it possible to instead of doing this: person.Walking -= person_Walking1; person.Walking -= person_Walking2;
Why is this creating a new row at the bottom with this data instead
How do I return the count of rows returned by this query instead of
An example: getAppletContext().showDocument( new URL(javascript:alert(document.getElementById('textbox').value); )); Instead of alerting this textbox value, I want

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.