Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 538185
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T10:00:18+00:00 2026-05-13T10:00:18+00:00

Instead of this can i write it in such a way that the definition

  • 0

Instead of this can i write it in such a way that the definition is inside the function?

    delegate object ObjFunc(long c);
    static Object MyFunc(this SqlConnection conn, ObjFunc func)
    {
        return func(1);
    }
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T10:00:18+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 10:00 am

    You can’t. But you may want to use Func<long, object> already present in .NET 3.5.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

where can i find this class StringEscapeUtils that can automatically escape the characters instead
Can I copy only the error message from Eclipse Problems with instead of this
Instead of app-id@appspot.com or any@app-id.appspot.com I would like to use any@own-domain.tld. can this be
Can someone explain to me why this returns an empty string () instead of
I can't see a clear mistake in this code. Instead of validating my fields,
Is there any get() function for this instead? {% for key, value in choices.items
UPDATE : I do appreciate don't want that, want this instead suggestions. They are
Do you think that C# will support something like ??= operator? Instead of this:
It's possible in C# to write things such way: Instrument instr = new Instrument
I was looking at this post that describes a simple way to do databinding

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.