Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 530883
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T09:14:36+00:00 2026-05-13T09:14:36+00:00

int a, b, c, d, e; a = b = c = d =

  • 0
int a, b, c, d, e;
a = b = c = d = e = 1;

if ((a==b) && (b==c) && (c==d) && (d==e))
{
    Console.WriteLine("that syntax is horrible");
}

is there a more elegant way to test multiple equality as above?

maybe an AreEqual(params obj[]) or something? I had a google but didn’t find anything.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T09:14:36+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 9:14 am

    A possible implementation of AreEqual(params object[] objects):

    (Following Jon Skeet’s advice, here’s a generic version)

    bool AreEqual<T>(params T[] objects)
    {
        if (objects.Length <= 1) return true;
        return objects.Skip(1).All(x => x.Equals(objects[0]));
    }
    

    The Skip(1) is not strictly necessary either.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 541k
  • Answers 541k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I would consider using MEDIUMINT sometimes.. on 300K rows.. MEDIUMINT… May 17, 2026 at 2:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer in addition to the reasons stated (which can mean UB… May 17, 2026 at 2:48 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer $(function () { $("#product_photo").load(function (e) { vZoom.add(this, this.src.replace('T.', '.')); })… May 17, 2026 at 2:48 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

I am creating WCF service that will download & upload xml files. When trying
I got two console applications that the first one runs the second one: 1_first
In C++, I can do something like this: int i[10] = new int[10]; int
I know that this can be easily done by using if(i%5 == 0 OR
I have a class that creates a static array of all properties, using a
I would like to create very simple program that could help my relative to
Ruby setters—whether created by (c)attr_accessor or manually—seem to be the only methods that need
I'm running AQTime on this piece of code, I found that .IndexOf takes 16%
copy paste the following code in new C# console app. class Program { static
Why this can't compile: // RefToPointers.cpp : Defines the entry point for the console

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.