Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8593493
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T00:00:06+00:00 2026-06-12T00:00:06+00:00

int main() { class A { public: static double test_code(const A& a); }; class

  • 0
int main() {

 class A {
    public:
    static double test_code(const A& a);
  };

   class B : public A {
   public:
   B(int i) { };
   static double test_code2(const B& b);
   };

A::test_code(2);
B::test_code2(2);

return 0;

}

cf : http://ideone.com/ilfE8

The first method call will not compile, while the second will. Is there any way to make this conversion work? thanks

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T00:00:08+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 12:00 am

    No, that cannot be done for an implicit type conversion. There are multiple reasons for that, the simpler is that for that to be an option the compiler would have to know at the place of call about all possible types that extend A and then check whether any/all of them can be implicitly converted from an int, resolve potential ambiguities… note that all types extending from a given type is an open set that can be extended after the current translation unit has been built!

    You can achieve something alike that in different ways, like for example creating a function that takes the int and returns an A object, or explicitly creating the B. But none of them allow for an implicit conversion (i.e. without modifying the code to explicitly request the path for the conversion).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

public class MultiplicationTable { public static void main (String[]a){ int[] x; x = new
public class Sample { public static void main(String[] args) { int year = 2012;
public class I { public static void main(String args[]) { int i=0,j=1,k=2; i=i++ -
class test{ int x; public: //public functions getx() and putx() }; void main() {
class Program { internal delegate int CallBack(int i); static void Main(string[] args) { CallBack
I have the next scenario: I define an int[][] variable in my main class.
Consider the following code: template<int* a> class base {}; int main() { base<(int*)0> test;
int main(void) { char testStr[50] = Hello, world!; char revS[50] = testStr; } I
int main() { char *p,c; for(p=Hello World;c=*p;++p) { printf(%c,c); } } In the above
int main() { int b[2][3]={{1,2},{3,4,5}}; cout << b[0][2] << endl; } And the result

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.