Home/ Questions/Q 1108009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Asked: 2026-05-17T02:01:05+00:00

int main() { int x=5,y=10,z=15; printf(%d %d %d); return 0; } Output: 15 10

  • 0
int main()
{
  int x=5,y=10,z=15;
  printf("%d %d %d");
  return 0;
}

Output: 15 10 5 //In Turbo C 4.5

    3 Garbage values in gcc compiler

My teacher told me when we define the variables like int x=5,y=10,z=15; they are by default taken as auto type and stored in stack.When you try print 3 integer values without using their names by printf(), it will print those 3 values in LIFO format as Turbo C compiler does.
But what I think when we define 3 integer variables, they may not be stored in continuous memory locations.So when I try to print 3 integer values without using their names, the compiler will print any three values from top of the stack.so the output will come 3 garbage values as in gcc..

Share

Leave an answer

You must login to add an answer.

Need An Account,

1 Answer

  1. Editorial Team

    This code just shows that Turbo C is poor at optimizing code and puts everything on the stack, while gcc is more aggressive and keeps it in registers or throws it away all together because these three variables have no purpose.

    Anyway, calling printf with a pattern that requires three arguments without providing these arguments, is a mistake.

    Update:

    As an explanation: I’m assuming that printf() will always take its argument from the stack since it’s a function with a variable argument list. Or does anybody know any other calling convention for functions like printf()? Futhermore, I’m assuming there’s no need to put anything else on the stack as there are no other variables. So this mistaken call of printf will print whatever is on top of the stack in main(). But there might be other architectures and calling conventions where my assumpations don’t hold.

    • 0