Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 115297
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T02:59:49+00:00 2026-05-11T02:59:49+00:00

int n = 5; for(int i = 0;i!=n;i++)//condition != { //executing 5times } int

  • 0
int n = 5; for(int i = 0;i!=n;i++)//condition != { //executing 5times }  int n = 5; for(int i = 0;i<n;i++)//condition < { //executing 5times  } 

Which one is preferred?

This was example from ‘Accelerated C++ : practical programming by example / Andrew Koenig, Barbara E. Moo.’ Just wanted to know why the Author prefers the first one

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T02:59:49+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 2:59 am

    The second. For two reasons

    1. The less than (or sometimes <=) is the usual way that most coder write these, and it’s better to stick to convention if possible – the != will probably make most coders look twice to check if there’s something odd in the loop whereas the < will be instantly understood.

    2. The != depends on an exact condition. If the interior of the loop is modified during maintenance and i accidentally incremented inside the loop then you would end up with an infinite loop. Generally it’s always better to make your termination condition as wide as possible – it’s simply more robust.

    2 is of course the reason why 1.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 264k
  • Answers 264k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I think valinc = Response.Write(System.IO.File.ReadAllText(inc)); should be valinc = System.IO.File.ReadAllText(inc); May 13, 2026 at 12:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer UNION-ing two OUTER JOIN statements should result in duplicate rows… May 13, 2026 at 12:16 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer To the point, just write the same code in JSP… May 13, 2026 at 12:16 pm

Related Questions

What's wrong with this C# code? I tried to overload the + operator to
here is a simple d/tango code in windows: module d_test.d; import tango.util.log.Trace; import tango.core.Thread;
I have some problem with CompletionService. My task: to parse parallely for about 300
There is simple cipher that translates number to series of . ( ) In

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.