Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8086749
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 5, 20262026-06-05T18:32:53+00:00 2026-06-05T18:32:53+00:00

int* p_bob = new int; *p_bob = 78; The above code makes sense to

  • 0
int* p_bob = new int;

*p_bob = 78;

The above code makes sense to me. I use the de-reference operation to allocation new memory and assign a value of 78.

int* p_dynint = new int[10];
*p_dynint[2] = 12;

This however doesn’t make sense. If I try to use the de-reference operator on p_dynint[] I get an error. Why would an array be any different?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-05T18:32:56+00:00Added an answer on June 5, 2026 at 6:32 pm

    *p_bob = 78; this assigns the value 78 to the memory pointed to by p_bob (which represents an int).

    p_dynint[2] = 12; simply accesses the 3rd element.

    p_dynint[2] is actually equivalent to *(p_dynint+2).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following code, which doesn't compile: int *p = new(nothrow) int; delete
Consider the following code: int main() { int *p; ++((int){5}); //compile without err/warning &((int){5});
While trying to answer this question I found that the code int* p =
Consider the following code: int main() { int i; volatile int* p = &i;
Here is a code snippet I was working with: int *a; int p =
Here's the code: public class Exc { int x = 2; public void throwE(int
I want to insert an int value in a vector object at position -1,
I have code: public delegate int SomeDelegate(int p); public static int Inc(int p) {
int main( ) { int *p; p=(int *)malloc(20); printf(%u,p); \\ printing some memory adress
int a[A][B]; int* p = a[i]; //i<A-1 then what's the actual operation of the

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.