Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9183367
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T18:47:07+00:00 2026-06-17T18:47:07+00:00

int sum = 0; for (int n = N; n > 0; n /=

  • 0
int sum = 0; 
for (int n = N; n > 0; n /= 2)
   for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
      sum++; 

I was pretty sure it grows in nlogn but was told it’s linear… Why is it linear and not linearithmic?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T18:47:08+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 6:47 pm

    It is linear. Imagine for a second n is 64. The inner loop runs 64 times, then 32 times, then 16 times, then 8 times, then 4 times, then 2 times, then 1 time. 64 + 32 + 16 + 8 + 4 + 2 + 1 = 127.

    So it requires 2n-1 total operations (for a power of 2, but that doesn’t change the analysis), assuming the inner loop is not optimized away. That’s clearly O(n) — linear.

    If the inner for loop is optimized away (to sum += n;), it’s logarithmic.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The title is self explanatory, but I'll give an example anyways. int sum(int a,
here's the code: class Acount { int sum ; String owner ; //these seem
sum( int(i.replace(',',''))if re.search('\d',i)!=None for i in list) I would like to sum all elements
How can the following simple implementation of sum be faster? private long sum( int
Question is: Find the sum of all the primes below 2 million. I pretty
//head.h// extern int sum(int,int); //head.cpp// #include head.h #include stdafx.h int sum(int x, int y)
Following is a fancy code: class B { private: int sum; public: B ()
If I build a function with LLVM, like int sum(int a, int b) {
int sum(int number, int min, int counter) { int temp=0, n; n=number+temp; if ((number>=(n/2))
I need to write a program long int sum(int n) which sum the total

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.