Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7497597
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 29, 20262026-05-29T19:09:21+00:00 2026-05-29T19:09:21+00:00

Intel says after reset the processor is placed in real mode and the software

  • 0

Intel says after reset the processor is placed in real mode and the software initialization code starts at 0xFFFFFFF0H. My questions:

  • If processor is in real-mode how can it acess the memory > 1MB (0xFFFFFFF0H)

  • How this happens or what happens when RAM in < 4GB ( say 2GB)

  • If the BIOS is mapped at 0x000FFFFFH why processor starts executing at 0xFFFFFFF0H

Please help me with these questions.
Thanks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-29T19:09:23+00:00Added an answer on May 29, 2026 at 7:09 pm

    I finally found the answer in the Coreboot documentation:

    Whenever an x86 CPU wakes up after reset, it does it in Real Mode. This mode is limited to 1MiB address space and 64k offsets and the reset vector of the original 8086/88 was located at 0xFFFF0.

    As there was no change even if we run current processors like P3, these newer CPUs also feels like they where start at 0xF000:0xFFF0 after a reset. But they do not. The base of the code segment register is 0xFFFF0000 after reset, so the CPU generates a physical address of 0xFFFFFFF0 to the chipset. And the chipset is responsible to forward this area to the boot ROM. Its confusing: The CPU "thinks" it runs code at 0xF000:0xFFF0 but instead it uses code at 0xFFFFFFF0. The developers must have been tanked up when they realised this design into silicon.

    So it seems the Intel documentation talks about the physical address as used "on the wire", i.e. when accessing the real bus. And this is independent of the CPU mode (the bus doesn’t know or care about a CPU mode, it’s the CPUs duty to translate these things).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The Intel Architecture's Developer's Manual (Vol3A, Section 8-26), says: The Pentium processor and more
I've just installed Intel PS,XE 2011 Extreme Edition after completing my code hoping Intel
How can I put Intel asm code into my c++ application? I'm using Dev-C++.
With Intel's launch of a Hexa-Core(6) processor for the desktop, it looks like we
I'm studying the Intel's IA-32 software developer manual. In particular, I'm reading the following
In section 4.3 of Intel 64® and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual. Volume 1:
I'm trying to understand how I can paint simple graphics in x86 protected mode
Intel's documentation of MONITOR says: The MONITOR instruction arms address monitoring hardware using an
can anyone recommend portable SIMD library that provides a c/c++ API, works on Intel
I have a intel core i3 (not the 2nd generation i3) processor and windows

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.