Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7804605
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 2, 20262026-06-02T01:58:11+00:00 2026-06-02T01:58:11+00:00

Intel’s official optimization guide has a chapter on converting from MMX commands to SSE

  • 0

Intel’s official optimization guide has a chapter on converting from MMX commands to SSE where they state the fallowing statment:

Computation instructions which use a memory operand that may not be aligned to a 16-byte boundary must be replaced with an unaligned 128-bit load (MOVDQU) followed by the same computation operation that uses instead register operands.

(chapter 5.8 Converting from 64-bit to 128-bit SIMD Integers, pg. 5-43)

I can’t understand what they mean by “may not be aligned to a 16-byte boundary”, could you please clarify it and give some examples?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-02T01:58:12+00:00Added an answer on June 2, 2026 at 1:58 am

    Certain SIMD instructions, which perform the same instruction on multiple data, require that the memory address of this data is aligned to a certain byte boundary. This effectively means that the address of the memory your data resides in needs to be divisible by the number of bytes required by the instruction.

    So in your case the alignment is 16 bytes (128 bits), which means the memory address of your data needs to be a multiple of 16. E.g. 0x00010 would be 16 byte aligned, while 0x00011 would not be.

    How to get your data to be aligned depends on the programming language (and sometimes compiler) you are using. Most languages that have the notion of a memory address will also provide you with means to specify the alignment.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I read the Intel Optimization guide Guide For Intel Architecture. However, I still have
I am trying out Intel MKL and it appears that they have their own
Intel guide says The logical address consists of a 16-bit selector and 32-bit offset.
I just updated Intel C++ from 12.0 to 12.1. I uninstalled the 12.0 from
Has anyone used the Intel Math Kernel library http://software.intel.com/en-us/intel-mkl/ I am thinking of using
Does Open64 has something equivalent to Intel Short Vector Math Library Operations . Thank
My current laptop has Intel Core2 Duo P9500 @2.53GHz with 4GB memory. Running android
I am optimizing some code for an Intel x86 Nehalem micro-architecture using SSE intrinsics.
Intel's 32-bit processors such as Pentium have 64-bit wide data bus and therefore fetch
Intel makes microprocessor, so he could define the instruction format and its corresponse assembly

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.