Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3360468
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T02:59:46+00:00 2026-05-18T02:59:46+00:00

Intrigued by this question , I have played a bit with parallel assignment with

  • 0

Intrigued by this question, I have played a bit with parallel assignment with arrays and method calls. So here’s an paradigmatic example, trying to swap two members in an array, by their value:

deck = ['A', 'B', 'C']
#=> ["A", "B", "C"]
deck[deck.index("A")], deck[deck.index("B")] = deck[deck.index("B")], deck[deck.index("A")]
#=> ["B", "A"]
deck
#=> ["A", "B", "C"]

The array hasn’t changed. But if we change the order of arguments, it works:

deck[deck.index("B")], deck[deck.index("A")] = deck[deck.index("A")], deck[deck.index("B")]
#=> ["A", "B"]
deck
#=> ["B", "A", "C"]

I guess it has to do with the order of calling the index methods within the assignment, but not see it clearly. Can someone please explain the order of things underneath, and why the first example doesn’t swap the member, and second does?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T02:59:46+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 2:59 am

    It is expected. It follows from how ruby evaluates expressions.

    deck[deck.index("A")], deck[deck.index("B")] = deck[deck.index("B")], deck[deck.index("A")]
    

    Implies

    deck[deck.index("A")], deck[deck.index("B")] = 'B', 'A'
    

    Note: strings ‘A’ and ‘B’ here are for illustration only. Ruby doesn’t create new string objects here. Which essentially is:

    deck[deck.index("A")] = 'B' -> deck[0] = 'B' (deck = ['B', 'B', 'C'])
    deck[deck.index("B")] = 'A' -> deck[0] = 'A' (deck = ['A', 'B', 'C'])
    

    Array#index returns when it finds the first match.

    Now,

    deck[deck.index("B")], deck[deck.index("A")] = deck[deck.index("A")], deck[deck.index("B")]
    -> deck[deck.index("B")], deck[deck.index("A")] = 'A', 'B'
    -> deck[deck.index("B")] = 'A' -> deck[1] = 'A' (deck = ['A', 'A', 'C'])
    -> deck[deck.index("A")] = 'B' -> deck[0] = 'B' (deck = ['B', 'A', 'C'])
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I asked this question earlier. I am intrigued by std::set but I have another
I have a somewhat hack-ish question and I'm intrigued as to how I would
I was just reading another question and this code intrigued me: for(i = 0;
This is most likely a ridiculous question, but I'm intrigued by the thought so
I was intrigued by this answer to my question about getting vim to highlight
I was reading this SO question and I got intrigued by what are Boolean
Intrigued by this question about infinite loops in perl: while (1) Vs. for (;;)
Here's a real life example I had experienced before, and this is something that
So I have been intrigued by the ?? operator, but have still been unable
Apologies for what may very well be a stupid question. I'm just intrigued as

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.