Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 549339
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T11:10:26+00:00 2026-05-13T11:10:26+00:00

io_iterator_t enumerator; kern_return_t result; result = IOServiceAddMatchingNotification( mNotifyPort, kIOMatchedNotification, IOServiceMatching( IOFireWireLocalNode ), serviceMatchingCallback, (void

  • 0

 
io_iterator_t enumerator;
kern_return_t   result;
result = IOServiceAddMatchingNotification(
             mNotifyPort,
             kIOMatchedNotification,
             IOServiceMatching( "IOFireWireLocalNode" ),
             serviceMatchingCallback, 
             (void *)0x1234,
             & enumerator );


serviceMatchingCallback((void *)0x1234, enumerator);

if i declare serviceMatchinCallback as static then it works, but i do not want it to be static. Is there a way to pass it a non-static callback function?

Thank you

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T11:10:27+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 11:10 am

    You could keep it static, but use the userdata to store the this pointer in addition to whatever other userdata you want (by packing them into a structure, for example) and then call an object-specific callback from the static version by calling this->someCallback (where this is the pointer stored in the userdata, of course).

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 266k
  • Answers 266k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Header files are just copy-pasted into the source file —… May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The * is expanded, what you can do is use… May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer http://cocoadevcentral.com/ is another good source. May 13, 2026 at 12:39 pm

Related Questions

void functions::start() { io_iterator_t enumerator; ...some code... result = IOServiceAddMatchingNotification( mNotifyPort, kIOMatchedNotification, IOServiceMatching( IOFireWireLocalNode
After experimenting with an iterator block I noticed the generated IL code is not
This just won't work. The problem is that I do not know enough to
Which class implements all the Connection Interfaces which are in javax.microedition.io package and how?
In java a class can implement Iterable which lets you use the foreach() statement

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.